Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> Sam, after I make the move tonight (for me that is GMT+1) to commons,
would
> you be able to update the GUMP script to point to that location ? Would
you
> be able to also copy the generated files to a nightly deliverables area.
You
> can use the 'dist' target of Cactus to do that and set the 'dist.dir'
> property prior to calling the Ant build script. The only issue that I see
is
> with the names of the nignhlty deliverables. For the moment, the names
that
> the dist target makes end with the version number (that was for
SourceForge,
> I had to upload unique file names so I put the version number in them). I
> can either remove the version and then it will be up to GUMP to rename
the
> file with the date for exemple or I can change the dist target to do that
> and when we release a version we just manually copy the files from a
nightly
> build to the release area, renaming the files in the same process. What
do
> you prefer ?

I'll take a look and see what I can do (I'm at ApacheCon, so don't be
surprised if I miss a day or two)...

The thing I need to look at is the need to support two servlet APIs.

- Sam Ruby

P.S.  My preference is for stable file names.  If you want to put the
version number into either the directory or the jar name, I would suggest
making the version number an Ant property.

Reply via email to