> On 7/31/01 1:11 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'd like us to vote on releasing version 1.0 of the HTTP Client component. > > > > As appeared to be generally agreed upon, HTTP client shouldn't have > > dependencies with log4j > > I don't really have anything to do with httpclient so I'm not > going to go against what you wish but how are we going to > deal with logging in all the commons components? Well, that is still undecided. I have proposed using exclusively interceptors / hooks / events, but other people thought it was not enough, and suggested defining a simple Logger interface (there's one in a lot of other Jakarta projects, like Tomcat). Remy
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing changes Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing change... Jason van Zyl
- RE: [httpclient] logging and testing ch... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testin... Jason van Zyl
- RE: [httpclient] logging and t... Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [httpclient] logging and testing changes Kevin Seguin
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing changes Scott Sanders
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing change... Remy Maucherat
- [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP client 1.0 rel... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP client... Jason van Zyl
- Re: [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP c... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP client... Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP client... Scott Sanders
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing change... robert burrell donkin
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing ch... Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testin... robert burrell donkin
- RE: [httpclient] logging and testing changes Waldhoff, Rodney
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing changes Remy Maucherat