> There are many features which could (and probably will) be added to the HTTP > client, but I think many people (including myself, since the Slide WebDAV > client is an extension of this HTTP client) need a stable version on which > they could base their work on. Agree 100%. I have already been hit by not having a released version. > > HTTP Client 1.0 release ballot : > [ ] +1 I am in favor of this release and will help > [ ] +0 I am in favor of this release, but am unable to help > [ ] -0 I am not in favor of this release, and my reason is: > > (Note: There's no -1 in the ballot, since vetoing a release is not allowed > under normal circumstances - please correct me if I'm wrong) +1 - I am willing to help and support the release, just let me know what I can do. Scott
- RE: [httpclient] logging and testing ch... Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testin... Jason van Zyl
- RE: [httpclient] logging and t... Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [httpclient] logging and testing changes Kevin Seguin
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing changes Scott Sanders
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing change... Remy Maucherat
- [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP client 1.0 rel... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP client... Jason van Zyl
- Re: [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP c... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP client... Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testin... Scott Sanders
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing change... robert burrell donkin
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing ch... Vincent Massol
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testin... robert burrell donkin
- RE: [httpclient] logging and testing changes Waldhoff, Rodney
- Re: [httpclient] logging and testing changes Remy Maucherat