on 8/15/01 10:12 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It doesn't matter to such users that they can write adapters and Category > implementations and such -- they already have their own logging > environment, and want to use *that* instead without having to learn > Log4J's configuration formats, or enough internals to integrate it. If you use a Logging API in commons, they will have to write the equivalent of Adapters for proxying whatever system they are currently using. -jon
- Logging Jason van Zyl
- Re: Logging Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Logging Jari Worsley
- Re: Logging Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Logging Jon Stevens
- Re: Logging Jason van Zyl
- Re: Logging Vincent Massol
- Re: Logging Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Logging Vincent Massol
- Re: Logging Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Logging Michael Rimov
- Re: Logging Vincent Massol
- Re: Logging Ceki Gülcü
- Re: Logging Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Logging Ceki Gülcü