on 8/15/01 10:12 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It doesn't matter to such users that they can write adapters and Category
> implementations and such -- they already have their own logging
> environment, and want to use *that* instead without having to learn
> Log4J's configuration formats, or enough internals to integrate it.

If you use a Logging API in commons, they will have to write the equivalent
of Adapters for proxying whatever system they are currently using.

-jon

Reply via email to