2008/10/28, Sebastien Lelong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > From all the points, which do you think should be put in the final 0.1 > release ? > > For 0.1, I'd 6 and 7 (maybe a little of 5...)
Yes, documentation, samples, test files / test setup (which are close to samples, if we can generate them from board/test files). BTW: do you have a board file for your test board? > > > 7 includes testing (tools, strategy), as well as continues integration > > (compilation or testing). An important statment (of Eur iirc) however > > is: we also need to write jal code. The aim is to provide a lot of > > functionality that can be used (= do work and are properly documented) > > on a lot of pic's. Tools support this, but also take time that can't > > be spent on jal programming. > > Without such tools, you can also waste a lot of time, for the same things, > again and again. It's a good investment IMHO. Once configured, you have few > to do to maintain it. As any project, you don't only produce what is > considered the final results (and we also write a lot of code which produce > jal code :)). I'm almost done on my buildbot, so I suggest we give a try, > and see how it consumes our time (on the long term). > I agree. My statement is that we should concider the time spent on tools and the benefits. But you impress me over and over again how little time you need to create all this great tools! Or should I be impressed by the little sleep you can survive on? Joep --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
