Hi Rob,
Somewhat surprising that both ZIP-files are downloaded 1:1, while for > the tar.gz files it is 1:3. Well, maybe the figures are too small to > draw conclusions. Doesn't this mean there are three times more windows users than *nix ones, and the latter know what to download ? :) > In my opinion the final 0.1 release should in principle be not much > different in contents/functionality than beta 0.1. Only apparent > mistakes or omissions should be corrected, like samples that didn't make > it the validation phase. Also simple improvements could be made like > those in the HTML docs. > Let's wait a little if there come suggestions from the users. I'd also like to put testing stuff (matrix, html pages, ...) to show how we test things, how we want to control the quality, etc... This also gives a nice overview of which PICs are the most tested, which have the most samples, so users can say: "ok, this one seems to have high support, I'll start with it"; The compiler distribution may add a reference to Jallib. The compiler > and Jallib might be more integrated: now people have to 'shop' at 2 > places to obtain both the compiler and libs. Maybe an idea to > redistribute the compiler as part of Jallib? We can then drop Kyle's > device files and integrate the compiler in our download packages. Absolutely ! Including the compiler distribution within jallib would be easy. Including device files within the compiler's distribution would be... I don't know, we need to ask Kyle :) About having the compiler within a jallib packages, do yo think it's worth doing this for the final 0.1 ? Seb --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
