Joep Suijs wrote:
> 2008/11/14 Sebastien Lelong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> BTW, anyone who wants to deal with the licenses into the repos ?
>> (or is it my burden :))
>>
> I'm happy to help some time in the next few days. And I think that
> 'deal with the licences' means substitute bsd with zlib? Please show
> me one and i'll take care of the rest (except for the blink and
> device files).
Of course I'll take care of the required changes in the device files,
which will get the zlib license.
To be sure: in the headers the only changes are:
'BSD' will become 'ZLIB'
the URL will become:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/zlib-license.html
I suppose samples will remain under BSD? At least these are not meant
to be distributed in binary form (who would want to do that anyway?).
And all other material (tools, scripts, docs, etc) which will not
ultimately end up as PIC code will also remain under BSD?
Regards, Rob.
--
Rob Hamerling, Vianen, NL (http://www.robh.nl/)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
