Hi Rob, > Of course I'll take care of the required changes in the device files, > which will get the zlib license. > To be sure: in the headers the only changes are: > 'BSD' will become 'ZLIB' > the URL will become: > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/zlib-license.html
Seems nice, this is what I was thinking > I suppose samples will remain under BSD? At least these are not meant > to be distributed in binary form (who would want to do that anyway?). > And all other material (tools, scripts, docs, etc) which will not > ultimately end up as PIC code will also remain under BSD? This is also what I was thinking :) Samples should remain under BSD, for the exact reason you expose. I may be considered as a little paranoid, but for me, only the minimum (that is libraries), should be under zlib. Cheers, Seb -- Sébastien LELONG http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
