I replaced the license in all the libs including device files. But... I wondered if anyone asked Stef? (if not, I will mail him).
Joep 2008/11/15, Sebastien LELONG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Rob, > > > Of course I'll take care of the required changes in the device files, > > which will get the zlib license. > > To be sure: in the headers the only changes are: > > 'BSD' will become 'ZLIB' > > the URL will become: > > http://www.opensource.org/licenses/zlib-license.html > > Seems nice, this is what I was thinking > > > I suppose samples will remain under BSD? At least these are not meant > > to be distributed in binary form (who would want to do that anyway?). > > And all other material (tools, scripts, docs, etc) which will not > > ultimately end up as PIC code will also remain under BSD? > > This is also what I was thinking :) > Samples should remain under BSD, for the exact reason you expose. I may be > considered as a little paranoid, but for me, only the minimum (that is > libraries), should be under zlib. > > Cheers, > Seb > -- > Sébastien LELONG > http://www.sirloon.net > http://sirbot.org > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
