> > > "jallib-jaledit-pack-win32" is a bit of a long name, and I would like to > include a simulator like PICShell and may be pogrammers in the pack, with > the option to select during install. In that case the name might be even > bigger. >
OK, right, let's keep "jalpack". Reading this, I also understand there could be a *nix version: jallib + jalv2 + picshell (cross-plaftform) + some programmers / bootloader ? Yes, displaying all files in one screen would make the license too big, > having it on 3 wizard pages is irritating. > But it's important to display them all (IMHO), even if it's long (which is quite usual). Nobody's reading this anyway, except when you actually want to (redistribute, for instance). So, at least, all licenses are displayed, people know where they are. What do you think ? > > Having a single documentation page (so one PDF) is something I have to deal > with, see issue 39 (http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=39). > I guess I have to allocate some time on this ! > If that is made, it can be included in the distro with the ability to > invoke the file on F1. > OK, I'll try to do this by the end of next week. Seb -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
