Comment #12 on issue 78 by sebastien.lelong: Normalized format for jallib information http://code.google.com/p/jallib/issues/detail?id=78
I think it's still better to keep JSON format. There are (most of the time) libraries to handle this format, it comes for free for many languages. Yes python format is easy, yet it will require a parser. And some people don't like writing parsers :) I keep them as they are, we'll see in the future what to do with them Seb -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
