On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:47 PM, mattschinkel <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > I don't know what to do about previous authors > > > > They should be kept I guess. Maybe we can have authors on first page, not > on > > every section (not like tutorials) > > I was thinking to just put "Jallib Group" as the author, that includes > everyone doesn't it? Anyone whom had participated in the previous pjal > doc should raise there voice :) > > I think you want me yelling now... :) I'm thinking that (really, I do), I'm old enough (and smart enough) to believe that a name on a paper (book, article or even a gold medal) does not means anything. Try to meditate just a little to the sentence above. However, the "jallib group" is an entity which doesn't written a word on the original pjal documentation. So maybe keeping the title and the main authors as is, should be a good idea and put somewhere the jallib logo (BTW, someday my daughter ask me the copyrights incomes, when she draw it has 9 or 10 if I remember well and now has 19). When you add a reference to a paper you can't write "jallib group", so you have to name the people one by one. So, I think you've understood my point, however following the ICSP topics I'm sure you'll do exactly as you wish to... :) Vasile -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
