I don't mind keeping original authors if that is what you wish, but then we will need a current author instead of just putting Jallib Group.
Matt. On Apr 1, 2:17 am, vasile surducan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:47 PM, mattschinkel > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > I don't know what to do about previous authors > > > > They should be kept I guess. Maybe we can have authors on first page, not > > on > > > every section (not like tutorials) > > > I was thinking to just put "Jallib Group" as the author, that includes > > everyone doesn't it? Anyone whom had participated in the previous pjal > > doc should raise there voice :) > > I think you want me yelling now... :) > > I'm thinking that (really, I do), I'm old enough (and smart enough) to > believe that a name on a paper (book, article or even a gold medal) does not > means anything. > Try to meditate just a little to the sentence above. > > However, the "jallib group" is an entity which doesn't written a word on the > original pjal documentation. So maybe keeping the title and the main authors > as is, should be a good idea and put somewhere the jallib logo (BTW, someday > my daughter ask me the copyrights incomes, when she draw it has 9 or 10 if I > remember well and now has 19). > > When you add a reference to a paper you can't write "jallib group", so you > have to name the people one by one. > > So, I think you've understood my point, however following the ICSP topics > I'm sure you'll do exactly as you wish to... > :) > > Vasile -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
