On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:17 AM, vasile surducan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:47 PM, mattschinkel > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > > I don't know what to do about previous authors >> > >> > They should be kept I guess. Maybe we can have authors on first page, >> not on >> > every section (not like tutorials) >> >> I was thinking to just put "Jallib Group" as the author, that includes >> everyone doesn't it? Anyone whom had participated in the previous pjal >> doc should raise there voice :) >> >> > I think you want me yelling now... :) > > I'm thinking that (really, I do), I'm old enough (and smart enough) to > believe that a name on a paper (book, article or even a gold medal) does not > means anything. > Try to meditate just a little to the sentence above. > > However, the "jallib group" is an entity which doesn't written a word on > the original pjal documentation. So maybe keeping the title and the main > authors as is, should be a good idea and put somewhere the jallib logo (BTW, > someday my daughter ask me the copyrights incomes, when she draw it has 9 or > 10 if I remember well and now has 19). > > When you add a reference to a paper you can't write "jallib group", so you > have to name the people one by one. > > So, I think you've understood my point, however following the ICSP topics > I'm sure you'll do exactly as you wish to... > :) > Oops, it seems you've change it... there still hope on the earth. :) Thank's God we have closed that topic. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
