The timer0 timer0 isr interval using it with 18fXXX chips there no option register it's T0CON for the timer0. The samples work if you use a crystal but most would use the Internal Oscillator. Don't get me wrong from what I seen jalv2 with jallibs is great I would like to see it grow. I started using it about 2 weeks ago it rocks. I had a little problem with the LCD code it was my fault the fuses set lvp on by default I should of new better and checked that first then I posted the sample code with out setting pin_direction which Rod spotted real quick Thanks Rod. Don't worry to much about the ADC it's going to get fixed that next on my list.
On Sep 2, 8:19 am, mattschinkel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Burt, all samples should work. What samples are not working? > > Rob, you are right about the comment about ADC. It is not good to > discourage someone from using ADC. Instead, the problem with ADC > should have been brought to our attention. If the code writer does not > like a lib, he can just say ADC lib will not work for this purpose. > > As for the code, there's nothing you can do about mistakes. It would > be nice if someone could review the writers code before a sample gets > added to torelease, but who is going to do that? > > Matt. > > On Sep 2, 8:44 am, Burt Ratliff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Your right this could be good jalv2 is great but some of the samples don't > > work which is bad because newbe's like me are what make people want to > > support jallib and jalv2 I been > > using swordfish basic for 2 years found this looking to get in to some usb > > coding . > > I hope you keep it going I like jalv2 it's good work. > > > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Rob Hamerling <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I have my doubts about the quality of some sample programs. For example in > > > 18f4550_usb_hid_generic.jal I read: > > > > -- adc lib is horribly broken, it won't work K50 series, so disable for > > >> the time being > > > > I think when a sample contains comments like this it should not be > > > released > > > (but it is in the current 06beta2). > > > > Apart from that, what is the purpose of the following code (just below the > > > above comment)? > > > > if ( (target_chip == PIC_18F14K50 ) | > > >> (target_chip == PIC_18F13K50 ) | > > >> (target_chip == PIC_18LF14K50 ) | > > >> (target_chip == PIC_18LF13K50 ) )then > > >> const bit no_analog = true > > >> else > > >> const bit no_analog = true > > >> end if > > > > The effect of the 'if' and 'else' branch are idential. So the if-then-else > > > is only ballast. The educational value of code like this is negative! > > > > I didn't scan all samples ... > > > > Regards, Rob. > > > > -- > > > R. Hamerling, Netherlands ---http://www.robh.nl > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "jallib" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<jallib%[email protected]> > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
