I didn't follow this point, but I (mis?)understood bug wasn't fully qualified. Creating such a compiler, another 2.4n, not coming from standard release way, doesn't sound like a good idea to me. Only Kyle should release compiler binaries, not us, or it'll be a maintenance nightmare...
Cheers, Seb 2011/1/31 Oliver Seitz <[email protected]> > > >I second Rob's advice, let stick to a stable compiler. > > While I agree in general, I want to point out that there seems to be a > variable-reuse problem that does only show when running the code, not while > compiling. Perhaps it would be best to include a 2.4n-version that defaults > to -no-variable-reuse. > > Greets, > Kiste > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jallib" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<jallib%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en. > > -- Sébastien Lelong http://www.sirloon.net http://sirbot.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
