>I didn't follow this point, but I (mis?)understood bug wasn't fully >qualified. Creating such a compiler, another 2.4n, not coming from standard >release way, doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
This is of course true. But for a beginner it is also a nightmare to have a sample that is said to be tested, that compiles without a warning, but does not run on real hardware. I have no magical solution for this. We could pack 2.4n and advise users to use "-no-variable-reuse" if possible. Greets, Kiste -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
