Hi Seb, On May 6, 11:51 am, Sebastien Lelong <[email protected]> wrote: > > Then you shouldn't put files under such an open source license, because this > just conflicts with it. >
In the JALLIB releases, and also inside of SVN, we have, in the header of each file, 3 pieces of information: 1) Author, 2) Copyright, 3) ZLIB license. All three are important and work together. Perhaps we have different views of the implications of these words in the header of each file? And by the way, what I actually wrote was: > Do you want authors to be able to give a veto on changes ? Yes, but I would expect it to be only as a last resort, when folks just can't seem to hammer out a compromise. I doubt if it will ever happen here at JALLIB. William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
