> There is no 24lc* lib or sample with 'eeprom' in the name.

I am only concerned about the file name, not the procedure names. See
here:
http://jallib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/include/external/storage/eeprom/

> for a library supporting his particular chip and not 'an eeprom',
> regardless of the type, size, interface etc?

First the user will look for the word eeprom, then they will look for
a particular chip. In grouping things, you usually look for the most
common word first.

For example, If you go to the microchip website, you will first click
on memory, then eeprom, then lastly, the device name.

> Your libs have ee_ in the name, which is probably only informative once you 
> know it means eeprom.
Yes, you will know what ee_ is after you read the file name. If you
feel it needs to be changed, we can do so.

> The function of a particular chip is easy to find with google if required, 
> and it is also described in the lib itself.
True, but this is about advertizing and an easy way for someone to
find an eeprom in the jallib pack.

As a jallib user shopping for an eeprom, I first look in the jallib
pack to see what jallib supports before I go out and purchase. I would
not like to open every file in the package to read what it is until I
find an eeprom. I think this is the most important point. How many
files do we have?

> Note that the naming mismatch between the sample and lib is true for
> quite a few samples and we might consider to change this: a sample is
> mandatory for each lib and unless there is a good reason, the name of
> the sample should be the same as the lib.

I do believe future samples can be named better, and according to the
lib. Maybe this should go in JSG. Libs must be named correctly
however.

Anyways, I hope you conciser my suggestion.

Matt.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jallib" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.

Reply via email to