> I gave you an alternative with arguments to you failed to respond I'm not sure what I failed to respond to. Maybe this?
> Specific about this 24lc* functionality: I guess when there is a lib > called '24lc256', people tend to use this and not notice one called > '24lc256_enhanced'. I'd rather have the difference in both names, e.g. > like _compact vs _fast (of _enhanced). I don't mind changing the name of my files to _simple or _compact. However, it should also contain eeprom_ I thought I mentioned this in the other topic, that I am willing to rename files. Was there another point I did not respond to? I'm surprised you get upset about suggestions. Name them as you like. When I stated "Anyways, I hope you conciser my suggestion. ", this meant that if you don't like my suggestion, don't do it. It does not mean do it my way. I'm not sure how you pulled that out of the sentence that I wrote. I only wish to help new users find and use our libraries. I apologize if I have offended you in any way, although i don't know how I did that. Matt. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jallib?hl=en.
