I want to have the group aliases controlled in an alias database table, just like JDBCVirtualUserTable. I don't want to have to update the config every time I add another group alias. Do the changes you plan on for the Redirect stuff involve functionality like that?
I really like JDBCVirtualUserTable, the only thing it's missing for my need is a one to many relationship between aliases.
Kenny Smith
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Kenny,
One of the things I intend to do is to fix up a few things in Redirect, and
then re-code most of the current similar classes to be Redirect subclasses.
That should clean up the entire area. Forwarding to a group would be
trivial at that point, with multiple ways to encode the group addresses.
I don't believe that there any any obstacles to doing that for James v2, so
you won't even have to wait for James v3 to be stable.
I don't think that you want JDBCAlias. JDBCVirtualUserTable, which you are
using, replaces JDBCAlias functionally, unless I missed something.
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
