Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I understand.  As I said, there seem to be a set of other issues that would
impact the selection of the connection pooling framework.  For example,
Serge seems to be pushing for JDK 1.4.1 for other things, and JDK 1.4.1
includes JDBC v3.  I'm just suggesting that the decision on those other
areas will influence this one.
I'm not pushing 1.4.1 in any way. I'm just saying if we move to the JNDI DNS service, we get a perk if the user is running the new JDK.

Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Reply via email to