> I'm not pushing 1.4.1 in any way. I'm just saying if we move to the
> JNDI DNS service, we get a perk if the user is running the new JDK.
Ah, I understand.
There are lots of benefits to JDK 1.4.1:
- JNDI DNS Service
- JDBC v3
- Better networking
- java.nio (too bad NBIO isn't more portable; we should look a SEDA, too)
- ...
We ought to consider whether we are willing to maintain James v2 for JRE
1.3+ and James v3 for JRE 1.4+. Considering that James v2 works well, and
James v3 will be a while in development, I have some inclination to suggest
that we adopt JRE 1.4+ for James v3. On the other hand, there is always
some risk involved in moving raising the JRE required.
Thoughts?
--- Noel
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
