In the 2.2.0a7 Redirect, not coding any "recipient" parameter means keeping it 
unaltered. For example,in my "spam" processor, I coded the following:

      <!-- spam. -->
      <processor name="spam">
         <mailet match="All" class="Redirect">
            <static>true</static>
            <sender>postmaster</sender>
            <replyto>postmaster</replyto>
            <returnPath>null</returnPath>
            <inline>none</inline>
            <attachment>message</attachment>
            <prefix>[SPAM WARNING]</prefix>
            <passThrough>true</passThrough>
            <message>
Based on our analyser, the attached message, addressed to you, has been classified as 
SPAM with a probability over 99%.
Reading the subject you should be able to confirm the analysis, and if true you can 
delete without even opening it.

Please don't reply to this e-mail as it has been automatically sent by the antivirus 
system.

Regards, Postmaster xyz.it
-----------------------------
            </message>
         </mailet>

         <mailet match="All" class="Forward">
            <forwardto>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</forwardto>
            <passThrough>true</passThrough>
         </mailet>

         <mailet match="All" class="ToRepository">
            <repositoryPath>file://var/mail/spam/</repositoryPath>
         </mailet>
      </processor>

Is this what you mean?

Vincenzo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hontvari Jozsef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: lunedi 23 giugno 2003 22.36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: subject prefix mailet or unaltered recipients in Redirect 
> 
> 
> Because Outlook Express cannot filter messages (spam) based on headers, I
> would need a mailet which adds a prefix to the subject. It mustn't do
> anything else, e.g. it doesn't change the message id etc.
> 
> This functionality is already in the code, in at least two places, in the
> Redirect mailet and in the GenericListServ mailet. As I already 
> experienced
> this it is not a simple operation, because it has to guess the appropriate
> charset.
> 
> I guess if there were an "unaltered" option in the recipients parameter of
> the redirect mailet then it would make the job. Or maybe a separate mailet
> is better. What do you think?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to