> I'm sure that everyone is in favour of hardening James as much as
possible.
> Its just that we should approach it from a Java perspective, not a C on
> Unix one. The issues are different.
Not so much. We seem to all be in agreement except on the specific case of
how many JVMs per machine, and why. We can discuss that in more detail on
james-dev@, and take Community@ off the distribution. But we should keep
Pier on the list (and add Stefano?) for this discussion.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
