> hey all, > i'm using 2.0a2 with smtphandler from 2.1a1-2002-8-18. > i currently have the following smtp config: > > <authRequired>true</authRequired> > <verifyIdentity>true</verifyIdentity> > > i would like to allow just one user to bypass verifyidentity and use a > business address. i am considering disabling verifyidentity and making > the folowing changes to the transport processor: > > <!-- Processor CONFIGURATION SAMPLE: transport is a sample custom > processor for local or remote delivery --> > <processor name="transport"> > <!-- Is the recipient is for a local account, deliver it > locally > --> > <mailet match="RecipientIsLocal" class="LocalDelivery"> > </mailet> > > <!-- If the host is handled by this server and it did not get > locally delivered, this is an invalid recipient --> > <mailet match="HostIsLocal" class="ToProcessor"> > <processor>error</processor> > </mailet> > > <!-- this begins my modification to the transport processor --> > <mailet > match="SenderIs=user1@localhost,user2@localhost,user3@localhost,user3@ > othe > rhost" > class="RemoteDelivery"> > <outgoing> file://var/mail/outgoing/ </outgoing> > <delayTime> 21600000 </delayTime> > <maxRetries> 5 </maxRetries> > </mailet> > > <mailet match="All" class="ToProcessor"> > <processor> error </processor> > </mailet> > <!-- this ends my modification to the transport processor --> > </processor> > > does anyone see any glaring problems with this modification or does > anyone know of a better way to accomplish the same thing?
I don't necessarily think that this is the best way to accomplish what you want. But it looks like it should work. As I understand it, you've got one user who isn't local. Why don't you grant that user an account, and have them use their otherhost address as the reply-to for mails sent on that account? That way you can maintain security, but allow all mails to the "otherhost" person to be delivered appropriately. You could also do something a little bit slicker, and put a mailet in the chain that checked for the "otherhost" person's local email address as a sender address and replaced it with the "otherhost" person's otherhost address. Is this not doable for political reasons? If you do it the way you describe the above, you're going to have to reconfigure your mailet (by adding a recipient) every time you add a user to the system. --Peter __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
