~> In point of fact, if the database is unavailable when the handler ~> receives e-mail from the sender, it will return an error to ~the sender.
~> no, this is incorrect as i have pointed out in the dev list. ~As has been demonstrated to you, if the database is down, and the JDBC ~driver reports the error, a 451 error is returned to the ~sender. That's working in James already. What you were told is that there are planned ~improvements so that James will reacquire connections within ~requiring a restart after a db server crash. That does not amount to a ~window for data loss. Noel - The latest stable version of James, as stated (20022106), does not notify the sender at all when the db is down and James cannot process the mail. ALL MAIL SENT TO JAMES WHEN IN THIS STATE IS LOST AND WITHOUT NOTIFICATION alan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
