>�From: Charles Benett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>�Date: Wed Aug 23 12:53:35 EDT 2000
> > Do you need someone to commit these changes the James,
>
> Yes, please!
>
> > and how does this affect the James/avalon interaction since I thought James was
>running off an older branch of avalon.
>
> We (meaning Peter Donald) branched the avalon cvs from the 25th June
> (about 5 mins after the date-timestamp on the jars in the JAMES dist and
> JAMES cvs). This branch compiles to the jars (as one would hope). The
> avalon patches need to be put on this branch (which I think Peter is
> doing). Once avalon has stabilised, it should be easy to migrate the
> patches to the main avalon branch.
>
> Even if you don't want to use TLS, to compile JAMES with these patches,
> you need the patched SocketServer. Perhaps we should compile that and
> update the jar. For that matter, we could compile all the patched avalon
> classes and update the jar in James - then people could downloaded the
> new jars and cvs source but would not be need either to use TLS or even
> to have JSSE. What do you think?
Sounds good to me... I don't really know much about avalon and can't help, so if you
know what you're doing, go for it! To restate what I think you're saying... we get
new avalon jar(s) on the same branch that have your patch in James CVS, everything
should still compile, and will have the ability to apply you patch to the James tree
so that if they want, they can follow the howto and get TLS working. One minor
question.. is there any reason you don't have TLS working with SMTP? I know some
email clients support that as well.
The only other question I'd have about adding your code to James CVS (if you do need
me to do it) is where to put everything? There's a couple of patches I guess to
existing files, and I guess the howto just goes in the docs directory. Is it that
simple?
Serge Knystautas
Loki Technologies
http://www.lokitech.com/
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/james%40list.working-dogs.com/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
