On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:38 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
> We need to assign access flags for arrays and primitive classes which
> have no corresponding cafebabe_class. Therefore ->access_flags field is
> introduced for struct vm_class.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec <[email protected]>
I'd rather we didn't make struct vm_object bigger than it already is.
Can't we introduce dummy struct vm_classes for arrays and primitive
classes?
Pekka
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Jatovm-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel