On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:36 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
> 2009/8/17 Pekka Enberg <penb...@cs.helsinki.fi>:
> > On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:38 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
> >> We need to assign access flags for arrays and primitive classes which
> >> have no corresponding cafebabe_class. Therefore ->access_flags field is
> >> introduced for struct vm_class.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec <tgrab...@gmail.com>
> >
> > I'd rather we didn't make struct vm_object bigger than it already is.
> > Can't we introduce dummy struct vm_classes for arrays and primitive
> > classes?
> >
> 
> My patch does not increase size of struct vm_object. It increases size
> of struct vm_class.

...oh, I am just blind! Applied, thanks!


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel

Reply via email to