2009/8/17 Pekka Enberg <penb...@cs.helsinki.fi>: > On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:38 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote: >> We need to assign access flags for arrays and primitive classes which >> have no corresponding cafebabe_class. Therefore ->access_flags field is >> introduced for struct vm_class. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec <tgrab...@gmail.com> > > I'd rather we didn't make struct vm_object bigger than it already is. > Can't we introduce dummy struct vm_classes for arrays and primitive > classes? >
My patch does not increase size of struct vm_object. It increases size of struct vm_class. -- Tomek Grabiec ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Jatovm-devel mailing list Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
