Doug Cutting wrote: > > > Some utilities for encrypting and decrypting binary fields might make a > useful contrib module, but I see no compelling reason to add this to the > core at this point. If such a contrib module becomes widely used, and > it becomes clear that it would work better if more tightly integrated, > then perhaps we could move it into the core. > > So, Victor, do you think this functionality could be reasonably packaged > as an add-on package to Lucene? If so, it would be much easier to get > it included in Lucene as a contrib module. > > Doug > Doug, for an answer to most of your questions could you please refer to my answer to Chris Hostetter, Chris makes some valid points:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Attached-proposed-modifications-to-Lucene-2.0-to-support-Field.Store.Encrypted-p7708481.html Victor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Attached-proposed-modifications-to-Lucene-2.0-to-support-Field.Store.Encrypted-tf2727614.html#a7708710 Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
