[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535335
 ] 

Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-743:
--------------------------------------

> in deciding "to clone or not clone" for the purposes of implementing 
> reopen, it may make sense to step back and ask a two broader questions...

I agree!

> 1) what was the motivation for approaching reopen using clones in the 
> first place

Good summarization! You are right, I started the clone approach because
IndexReaders are not "read only" objects.

> "if reopen(closeOld=false) returns a new reader it will share state with 
> the current reader, attempting to do the following operations on this 
> new reader will result in undefined behavior"

This would mean, that we simply warn the user that performing write 
operations with the re-opened indexreader will result in undefined behavior,
whereas with Mike's approach we would prevent such an undefined behavior by 
using reference counting.

Hmm, so what are our long-term plans for indexreaders? If our goal is to 
make them read-only (we can delete via IndexWriter already), then I think 
adding those warning comments to reopen(), as you suggest Hoss, would be 
sufficient. 

If everybody likes this approach I'll go ahead and submit a new patch.



> IndexReader.reopen()
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-743
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Otis Gospodnetic
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.3
>
>         Attachments: IndexReaderUtils.java, lucene-743-take2.patch, 
> lucene-743.patch, lucene-743.patch, lucene-743.patch, MyMultiReader.java, 
> MySegmentReader.java, varient-no-isCloneSupported.BROKEN.patch
>
>
> This is Robert Engels' implementation of IndexReader.reopen() functionality, 
> as a set of 3 new classes (this was easier for him to implement, but should 
> probably be folded into the core, if this looks good).

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to