Michael Busch wrote: > > One question that came to my mind: What's our policy for file format > backwards-compatibility? Is it the same as for APIs. That would mean > that Lucene 3.0 would have to be able to read indexes built with 2.9 but > not with earlier versions. I'd be all for such a policy, because that > would clean up some classes significantly. >
Hmm, actually this is probably too restrictive. But maybe we could say that Lucene 3.0 doesn't have to be able to read indexes built with versions older than 2.0? -Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
