On Oct 8, 2008, at 5:21 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
I've hit that failure too, from a checkout. It's an environment
specific thing for me. On certain machines it always fails, because
the JRE chooses too small a value for max heap size.
Compile & run this:
public class Heap {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("max mem is " +
(Runtime.getRuntime().maxMemory()/1024/1024) + "MB");
}
}
I have a Mac Pro with 6 GB RAM which *always* hits that failure, and
here's the output of this program:
max mem is 80MB
I don't get why Java would default to 80MB max heap on a machine
with 6 GB RAM.
It's just really weird to me that it passes consistently on trunk, but
the branch and the download do not. I've got a Mac Pro w/ 4 GB. So,
seems to be a Mac thing. That's w/ 1.5.
On a Windows machine with 1 GB RAM it defaults to 63 MB max. Then I
have a Linux machine with 4 GB of RAM that defaults to 974 MB max.
The workaround I do is to insert maxmemory="512M" attr into the
<junit...> task in common-build.xml.
Maybe we should commit that, for 2.9, but I don't think it should
block 2.4.0?
Agreed
On the junit lib, I also think we shouldn't hold up 2.4.0 for that,
but for 2.9 we should fix it?
Agreed.
Mike
Erik Hatcher wrote:
All tests pass (via "ant test") for me with the 2.4.0 download. I
have junit-4.4.jar in my ANT_HOME/lib directory.
Specifically:
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.store.TestHugeRamFile
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3.585
sec
Maybe an intermittent anomaly, Grant?
Erik
On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I really hate to do this, but the source tests don't compile,
since we now rely on JUnit to be shipped w/ Lucene.
Steps:
download the source tarball
untar
ant test
Lots of compile errors. I think we just need to package lib/junit
with the src. Of course, maybe not a big deal, as we didn't
package JUnit before, but we also didn't have a lib directory
before, either. Not sure if it is a show stopper.
However, when I copy junit into a lib directory there, I get:
[junit] Testcase:
testHugeFile(org.apache.lucene.store.TestHugeRamFile): Caused
an ERROR
[junit] Java heap space
[junit] java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
[junit] at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Arrays.java:2760)
[junit] at java.util.Arrays.copyOf(Arrays.java:2734)
[junit] at java.util.ArrayList.ensureCapacity(ArrayList.java:
167)
[junit] at java.util.ArrayList.add(ArrayList.java:351)
[junit] at
org.apache.lucene.store.RAMFile.addBuffer(RAMFile.java:69)
[junit] at
org
.apache
.lucene
.store.RAMOutputStream.switchCurrentBuffer(RAMOutputStream.java:129)
[junit] at
org
.apache
.lucene.store.RAMOutputStream.writeBytes(RAMOutputStream.java:115)
[junit] at
org
.apache
.lucene.store.TestHugeRamFile.testHugeFile(TestHugeRamFile.java:68)
[junit]
This passes when I run trunk on the same machine, but fails on
both the branch and the downloaded src file. I know I could just
increase the memory, but it seems odd that trunk passes.
Otherwise, things look good.
So -0, I guess.
On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Reminder: this is a new vote (started 2 days ago) to release 2.4.0.
We still need 2 more binding (PMC) votes to release.
Mike
Michael McCandless wrote:
OK maybe 4th time's a charm ;)
Let's start a new VOTE to release these artifacts (derived from
svn rev 701827) as Lucene 2.4.0:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4take4
Here's my +1.
Mike
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
+1.
On Oct 3, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
OK let's try again!
Let's start a new VOTE to release these artifacts (derived
from svn rev 701445) as Lucene 2.4.0:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4take3
Here's my vote: +1.
Mike
mark harwood wrote:
Hi Mike,
Given the repackaging any chance you can sneak in 2 contrib
fixes I added recently?
Null pointer introduced to clients dropping in 2.4 upgrade -
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=700815
Bug in fuzzy matching -
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=699512
No big deal if it's too late.
----- Original Message ----
From: Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 3 October, 2008 16:48:41
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0
Ugh. I'll fix & re-spin.
Mike
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
The docs in the downloaded tarball still refer to 2.4-dev.
The doap.rdf file is (badly) out of date.
On Sep 30, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
I've built the release artifacts, from revision 700430 on
the 2.4
branch. These are the changes:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4changes/Changes.html
Please vote to officially release these artifacts as 2.4.0:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4
We need at least 3 binding (PMC) votes.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]