Works for me. Thanks
-John On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Wang wrote: > >> This has been gone back and forth on this thread already. Again, I >> agree it is not the perfect solution. I am comparing that to the current >> behavior, I don't think it is worse. (Only in my opinion). >> > > So, if it's good enough for you, a user of java serialization, then perhaps > those of us who don't use java serialization shouldn't complain. I think > we'd want to add to the documentation something to the effect that this is > all that's been done, and that if the classes change substantially then all > bets are off. We do not want to imply that we're making any cross-version > compatibility guarantees about serialization, rather just that folks who're > willing to take their chances will not be impeded. Could something like > that work? > > Doug > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
