That thought occurred to me earlier, but I don't know enough specifics yet. I intend to find out though....
Erick On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Robert Muir (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12778101#action_12778101] > > Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2037 at 11/15/09 1:45 PM: > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Is there some way to use Junit4 parameterized tests to do this > LocalizedTestCase-type thing, so we don't have to override runBare()? > > > was (Author: rcmuir): > Is there some way to use Junit4 parameterized tests to do this > LocalizedTestCase-type thing, so we don't have to override runBase()? > > > > Allow Junit4 tests in our environment. > > -------------------------------------- > > > > Key: LUCENE-2037 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037 > > Project: Lucene - Java > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: Other > > Affects Versions: 3.1 > > Environment: Development > > Reporter: Erick Erickson > > Assignee: Erick Erickson > > Priority: Minor > > Fix For: 3.1 > > > > Attachments: junit-4.7.jar, LUCENE-2037.patch > > > > Original Estimate: 8h > > Remaining Estimate: 8h > > > > Now that we're dropping Java 1.4 compatibility for 3.0, we can > incorporate Junit4 in testing. Junit3 and junit4 tests can coexist, so no > tests should have to be rewritten. We should start this for the 3.1 release > so we can get a clean 3.0 out smoothly. > > It's probably worthwhile to convert a small set of tests as an exemplar. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
