[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779510#action_12779510
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1799:
-----------------------------------------
> Earwin, if implemented as a directory, we lose many of the advantages.
Damn. I believed all strings pass through read/writeString() on
IndexInput/Output. Naive. Well, one can patch UnicodeUtil, but the solution is
no longer elegant.
Waiting for flexible indexing, hoping it's gonna be flexible..
> Unicode compression
> -------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1799
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1799
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Store
> Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Reporter: DM Smith
> Priority: Minor
>
> In lucene-1793, there is the off-topic suggestion to provide compression of
> Unicode data. The motivation was a custom encoding in a Russian analyzer. The
> original supposition was that it provided a more compact index.
> This led to the comment that a different or compressed encoding would be a
> generally useful feature.
> BOCU-1 was suggested as a possibility. This is a patented algorithm by IBM
> with an implementation in ICU. If Lucene provide it's own implementation a
> freely avIlable, royalty-free license would need to be obtained.
> SCSU is another Unicode compression algorithm that could be used.
> An advantage of these methods is that they work on the whole of Unicode. If
> that is not needed an encoding such as iso8859-1 (or whatever covers the
> input) could be used.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
