Steven, do you still have a test setup to measure collation key generation performance with Lucene?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On 11/18/2009 at 7:16 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > > Looking at the collation support, we could maybe improve > > IndexableBinaryStringTools by using char[]/byte[] with offset and > > length. The existing ByteBuffer/CharBuffer methods could stay, they are > > consistent with Charset api and are not wrong imo, but instead defer to > > the new char[]/byte[] ones... the current buffer-based ones require the > > buffer to have a backing array anyway or will throw an exception. > > +1 > > I used *Buffers because I thought it simplified method prototypes, no other > reason. > > Steve > > -- Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
