Hi Robert, On 11/18/2009 at 7:16 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > Looking at the collation support, we could maybe improve > IndexableBinaryStringTools by using char[]/byte[] with offset and > length. The existing ByteBuffer/CharBuffer methods could stay, they are > consistent with Charset api and are not wrong imo, but instead defer to > the new char[]/byte[] ones... the current buffer-based ones require the > buffer to have a backing array anyway or will throw an exception.
+1 I used *Buffers because I thought it simplified method prototypes, no other reason. Steve
