It depends on how much work it is to remove the rest of the not per-segment able stuff in Solr. If this can be done shortly, I would choose option 2 or 3 with no preference, as I do not know your backwards compatibility requirements.
By the way, you wanted to send us your last Solr TokenStreams still using the old API? Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik > Seeley > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 2:53 AM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Solr 1.5 or 2.0? > > What should the next version of Solr be? > > Options: > - have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 2.9.x > - have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 3.x, with weaker back compat given all > of the removed lucene deprecations from 2.9->3.0 > - have a Solr 2.0 with a lucene 3.x > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
