We also had some (maybe helpful) opinions :-) ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -----Original Message----- > From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik > Seeley > Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3:31 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr 1.5 or 2.0? > > Oops... of course I meant to post this in solr-dev. > > -Yonik > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > > What should the next version of Solr be? > > > > Options: > > - have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 2.9.x > > - have a Solr 1.5 with a lucene 3.x, with weaker back compat given all > > of the removed lucene deprecations from 2.9->3.0 > > - have a Solr 2.0 with a lucene 3.x > > > > -Yonik > > http://www.lucidimagination.com > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
