Ok. I just set up a machine running solr and now I will index up a couple of gigabytes to see the difference in performance (using a sort).
But since my "real" index will be around 2TB in size I don't think sorting is the right way to go? I pretty sure I will have to modify the ranking. And yes the data must be instantly available. / Marcus -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: karl wettin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 18 maj 2006 16:48 Till: java-user@lucene.apache.org Ämne: Re: Sort problematics On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 16:22 +0200, Marcus Falck wrote: > Doesn't solr use the same sort implementation as Lucene ? Solr comes with more cache. Is it a requirement that the new data is instantly available? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
