Your maybeReopen has an excess incRef().

I'm not sure how you open the searchers in the first place?  The list
starts as empty, and nothing populates it?

When you do the initial population, you need an incRef.

I think you're hitting IllegalStateException because maybeReopen is
closing a reader before get() can get it (since they synchronize on
different objects).

I'd recommend switching to the SearcherManager class.  Instantiate one
for each of your searchers.  On each search request, go through them
and call maybeReopen(), and then call get() and gather each
IndexSearcher instance into a new array.  Then, make a new
MultiSearcher (opposite of what I said before): while that creates a
small amount of garbage, it'll keep your code simpler (good
tradeoff).

Mike

Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:

sorrry I added

release(multiSearcher);


instead of multiSearcher.close();

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <ami...@gmail.com >wrote:

Hi
I've now done the following:

public Summary[] search(final SearchRequest searchRequest) throwsSearchExecutionException {

final String searchTerm = searchRequest.getSearchTerm();

if (StringUtils.isBlank(searchTerm)) {

throw new SearchExecutionException("Search string cannot be empty. There
will be too many results to process.");

}

List<Summary> summaryList = new ArrayList<Summary>();

StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch("searchStopWatch");

stopWatch.start();

List<IndexSearcher> indexSearchers = new ArrayList<IndexSearcher>();

try {

LOGGER.debug("Ensuring all index readers are up to date...");

maybeReopen();

LOGGER.debug("All Index Searchers are up to date. No of index searchers '"+ indexSearchers.size() +
"'");

Query query = queryParser.parse(searchTerm);

LOGGER.debug("Search Term '" + searchTerm +"' ----> Lucene Query '" +
query.toString() +"'");

Sort sort = null;

sort = applySortIfApplicable(searchRequest);

Filter[] filters =applyFiltersIfApplicable(searchRequest);

ChainedFilter chainedFilter = null;

if (filters != null) {

chainedFilter = new ChainedFilter(filters, ChainedFilter.OR);

}

TopDocs topDocs = get().search(query,chainedFilter ,100,sort);

ScoreDoc[] scoreDocs = topDocs.scoreDocs;

LOGGER.debug("total number of hits for [" + query.toString() + " ] = "+topDocs.
totalHits);

for (ScoreDoc scoreDoc : scoreDocs) {

final Document doc = multiSearcher.doc(scoreDoc.doc);

float score = scoreDoc.score;

final BaseDocument baseDocument = new BaseDocument(doc, score);

Summary documentSummary = new DocumentSummaryImpl(baseDocument);

summaryList.add(documentSummary);

}

multiSearcher.close();

} catch (Exception e) {

throw new IllegalStateException(e);

}

stopWatch.stop();

LOGGER.debug("total time taken for document seach: " +
stopWatch.getTotalTimeMillis() + " ms");

return summaryList.toArray(new Summary[] {});

}


And have the following methods:

@PostConstruct

public void initialiseQueryParser() {

PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper analyzerWrapper = new PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper(
analyzer);

analyzerWrapper.addAnalyzer(FieldNameEnum.TYPE.getDescription(), newKeywordAnalyzer());

queryParser = newMultiFieldQueryParser(FieldNameEnum.fieldNameDescriptions(),
analyzerWrapper);

try {

LOGGER.debug("Initialising multi searcher ....");

this.multiSearcher = new MultiSearcher(searchers.toArray(newIndexSearcher[] {}));

LOGGER.debug("multi searcher initialised");

} catch (IOException e) {

throw new IllegalStateException(e);

}

}


Initialises mutltisearcher when this class is creared by spring.


private synchronized void swapMultiSearcher(MultiSearcher
newMultiSearcher)  {

try {

release(multiSearcher);

} catch (IOException e) {

throw new IllegalStateException(e);

}

multiSearcher = newMultiSearcher;

}

 public void maybeReopen() throws IOException {

MultiSearcher newMultiSeacher = null;

boolean refreshMultiSeacher = false;

List<IndexSearcher> indexSearchers = new ArrayList<IndexSearcher>();

synchronized (searchers) {

for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher: searchers) {

IndexReader reader = indexSearcher.getIndexReader();

reader.incRef();

Directory directory = reader.directory();

long currentVersion = reader.getVersion();

if (IndexReader.getCurrentVersion(directory) != currentVersion) {

IndexReader newReader = indexSearcher.getIndexReader().reopen();

if (newReader != reader) {

reader.decRef();

refreshMultiSeacher = true;

}

reader = newReader;

IndexSearcher newSearcher = new IndexSearcher(newReader);

indexSearchers.add(newSearcher);

}

}

}



if (refreshMultiSeacher) {

newMultiSeacher = new MultiSearcher(indexSearchers.toArray(newIndexSearcher[] {}));

warm(newMultiSeacher);

swapMultiSearcher(newMultiSeacher);

}



}


 private void warm(MultiSearcher newMultiSeacher) {

}



private synchronized MultiSearcher get() {

for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher: searchers) {

indexSearcher.getIndexReader().incRef();

}

return multiSearcher;

}

private synchronized void release(MultiSearcher multiSearcher) throwsIOException {

for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher: searchers) {

indexSearcher.getIndexReader().decRef();

}

}


However I am now getting


java.lang.IllegalStateException:
org.apache.lucene.store.AlreadyClosedException: this IndexReader is closed


on the call:


private synchronized MultiSearcher get() {

for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher: searchers) {

indexSearcher.getIndexReader().incRef();

}

return multiSearcher;

}


I'm doing something wrong ..obviously..not sure where though..


Cheers


On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:


I was wondering the same thing ;)

It's best to call this method from a single BG "warming" thread, in which
case it would not need its own synchronization.

But, to be safe, I'll add internal synchronization to it.  You can't
simply put synchronized in front of the method, since you don't want this to
block searching.


Mike

Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:

just a quick point:
public void maybeReopen() throws IOException {                 //D
long currentVersion = currentSearcher.getIndexReader().getVersion();
if (IndexReader.getCurrentVersion(dir) != currentVersion) {
IndexReader newReader = currentSearcher.getIndexReader().reopen();
  assert newReader != currentSearcher.getIndexReader();
  IndexSearcher newSearcher = new IndexSearcher(newReader);
  warm(newSearcher);
  swapSearcher(newSearcher);
}
}

should the above be synchronised?

On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <ami...@gmail.com
wrote:

thanks. i will rewrite..in between giving my baby her feed and playing
with the other child and my wife who wants me to do several other
things!



On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:


Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:

Hi

Thanks for your input. I would like to have a go at doing this myself
first, Solr may be an option.

* You are creating a new Analyzer & QueryParser every time, also
creating unnecessary garbage; instead, they should be created once
& reused.

-- I can moved the code out so that it is only created once and
reused.


* You always make a new IndexSearcher and a new MultiSearcher even when nothing has changed. This just generates unnecessary garbage
which GC then must sweep up.

-- This was something I thought about. I could move it out so that
it's
created once.  However I presume inside my code i need to check
whether
the
indexreaders are update to date. This needs to be synchronized as
well I
guess(?)


Yes you should synchronize the check for whether the IndexReader is
current.

* I don't see any synchronization -- it looks like two search

requests are allowed into this method at the same time? Which is
dangerous... eg both (or, more) will wastefully reopen the
readers.
--  So i need to extract the logic for reopening and provide a
synchronisation mechanism.


Yes.


Ok. So I have some work to do. I'll refactor the code and see if I
can

get
inline to your recommendations.


On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:


On a quick look, I think there are a few problems with the code:

* I don't see any synchronization -- it looks like two search
requests are allowed into this method at the same time? Which is
dangerous... eg both (or, more) will wastefully reopen the
readers.

* You are over-incRef'ing (the reader.incRef inside the loop) -- I
don't see a corresponding decRef.

* You reopen and warm your searchers "live" (vs with BG thread);
meaning the unlucky search request that hits a reopen pays the
cost.  This might be OK if the index is small enough that
reopening & warming takes very little time.  But if index gets
large, making a random search pay that warming cost is not nice to
the end user.  It erodes their trust in you.

* You always make a new IndexSearcher and a new MultiSearcher even when nothing has changed. This just generates unnecessary garbage
which GC then must sweep up.

* You are creating a new Analyzer & QueryParser every time, also creating unnecessary garbage; instead, they should be created once
& reused.

You should consider simply using Solr -- it handles all this logic
for
you and has been well debugged with time...

Mike

Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:

The reason for the indexreader.reopen is because I have a webapp
which

enables users to upload files and then search for the documents. If
I
don't
reopen i'm concerned that the facet hit counter won't be updated.

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
ami...@gmail.com

wrote:


Hi

I have been able to get the code working for my scenario, however I
have
a
question and I was wondering if I could get some help. I have a
list
of
IndexSearchers which are used in a MultiSearcher class. I use the
indexsearchers to get each indexreader and put them into a
MultiIndexReader.

IndexReader[] readers = new IndexReader[searchables.length];

for (int i =0 ; i < searchables.length;i++) {

IndexSearcher indexSearcher = (IndexSearcher)searchables[i];

readers[i] = indexSearcher.getIndexReader();

IndexReader newReader = readers[i].reopen();

if (newReader != readers[i]) {

readers[i].close();

}

readers[i] = newReader;



}

multiReader = new MultiReader(readers);

OpenBitSetFacetHitCounter facetHitCounter =
newOpenBitSetFacetHitCounter();

IndexSearcher indexSearcher = new IndexSearcher(multiReader);


I then use the indexseacher to do the facet stuff. I end the code
with
closing the multireader.  This is causing problems in another
method
where I
do some other search as the indexreaders are closed. Is it ok to
not
close
the multiindexreader or should I do some additional checks in the
other
method to see if the indexreader is closed?



Cheers


P.S. Hope that made sense...!


On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
ami...@gmail.com

wrote:


Hi


Thanks just what I needed!

Cheers
Amin


On 22 Feb 2009, at 16:11, Marcelo Ochoa <marcelo.oc...@gmail.com >
wrote:

Hi Amin:

Please take a look a this blog post:





http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2007/04/lucene-search-within-search-with.html
Best regards, Marcelo.

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
ami...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Hi


Sorry to re send this email but I was wondering if I could get
some
advice
on this.

Cheers

Amin

On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
ami...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Hi


I am looking at building a faceted search using Lucene. I know
that
Solr
comes with this built in, however I would like to try this by
myself
(something to add to my CV!). I have been looking around and I
found
that
you can use the IndexReader and use TermVectors. This looks ok
but
I'm
not
sure how to filter the results so that a particular user can
only
see
a
subset of results.  The next option I was looking at was
something
like

Term term1 = new Term("brand", "ford");
Term term2 = new Term("brand", "vw");
Term[] termsArray = new Term[] { term1, term2 };un
int[] docFreqs = indexSearcher.docFreqs(termsArray);

The only problem here is that I have to provide the brand type
each
time a
new brand is created. Again I'm not sure how I can filter the
results
here.
It may be that I'm using the wrong api methods to do this.

I would be grateful if I could get some advice on this.


Cheers
Amin

P.S. I am basically trying to do something that displays the
following

Personal Contact (23) Business Contact (45) and so on..










--
Marcelo F. Ochoa
http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/
http://marcelo.ochoa.googlepages.com/home
______________
Want to integrate Lucene and Oracle?




http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/2007/09/running-lucene-inside-your-oracle-jvm.html
Is Oracle 11g REST ready?


http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/2008/02/is-oracle-11g-rest-ready.html



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to