Nope. If i remove the maybeReopen the search doesn't work. It only works
when i cal maybeReopen followed by get().
Cheers
Amin
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> That's not right; something must be wrong.
>
> get() before maybeReopen() should simply let you search based on the
> searcher before reopening.
>
> If you just do get() and don't call maybeReopen() does it work?
>
>
> Mike
>
> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>
> I noticed that if i do the get() before the maybeReopen then I get no
>> results. But otherwise I can change it further.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Michael McCandless <
>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> There is no such thing as final code -- code is alive and is always
>>> changing ;)
>>>
>>> It looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Though one trivial thing is: I would move the code in the try clause up
>>> to
>>> and including the multiSearcher=get() out above the try. I always
>>> attempt
>>> to "shrink wrap" what's inside a try clause to the minimum that needs to
>>> be
>>> there. Ie, your code that creates a query, finds the right sort & filter
>>> to
>>> use, etc, can all happen outside the try, because you have not yet
>>> acquired
>>> the multiSearcher.
>>>
>>> If you do that, you also don't need the null check in the finally clause,
>>> because multiSearcher must be non-null on entering the try.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi there
>>>
>>>> Good morning! Here is the final search code:
>>>>
>>>> public Summary[] search(final SearchRequest searchRequest)
>>>> throwsSearchExecutionException {
>>>>
>>>> final String searchTerm = searchRequest.getSearchTerm();
>>>>
>>>> if (StringUtils.isBlank(searchTerm)) {
>>>>
>>>> throw new SearchExecutionException("Search string cannot be empty. There
>>>> will be too many results to process.");
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> List<Summary> summaryList = new ArrayList<Summary>();
>>>>
>>>> StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch("searchStopWatch");
>>>>
>>>> stopWatch.start();
>>>>
>>>> MultiSearcher multiSearcher = null;
>>>>
>>>> try {
>>>>
>>>> LOGGER.debug("Ensuring all index readers are up to date...");
>>>>
>>>> maybeReopen();
>>>>
>>>> Query query = queryParser.parse(searchTerm);
>>>>
>>>> LOGGER.debug("Search Term '" + searchTerm +"' ----> Lucene Query '" +
>>>> query.toString() +"'");
>>>>
>>>> Sort sort = null;
>>>>
>>>> sort = applySortIfApplicable(searchRequest);
>>>>
>>>> Filter[] filters =applyFiltersIfApplicable(searchRequest);
>>>>
>>>> ChainedFilter chainedFilter = null;
>>>>
>>>> if (filters != null) {
>>>>
>>>> chainedFilter = new ChainedFilter(filters, ChainedFilter.OR);
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> multiSearcher = get();
>>>>
>>>> TopDocs topDocs = multiSearcher.search(query,chainedFilter ,100,sort);
>>>>
>>>> ScoreDoc[] scoreDocs = topDocs.scoreDocs;
>>>>
>>>> LOGGER.debug("total number of hits for [" + query.toString() + " ] =
>>>> "+topDocs.
>>>> totalHits);
>>>>
>>>> for (ScoreDoc scoreDoc : scoreDocs) {
>>>>
>>>> final Document doc = multiSearcher.doc(scoreDoc.doc);
>>>>
>>>> float score = scoreDoc.score;
>>>>
>>>> final BaseDocument baseDocument = new BaseDocument(doc, score);
>>>>
>>>> Summary documentSummary = new DocumentSummaryImpl(baseDocument);
>>>>
>>>> summaryList.add(documentSummary);
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> } catch (Exception e) {
>>>>
>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>
>>>> } finally {
>>>>
>>>> if (multiSearcher != null) {
>>>>
>>>> release(multiSearcher);
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> stopWatch.stop();
>>>>
>>>> LOGGER.debug("total time taken for document seach: " +
>>>> stopWatch.getTotalTimeMillis() + " ms");
>>>>
>>>> return summaryList.toArray(new Summary[] {});
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope this makes sense...thanks again!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> Amin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're calling get() too many times. For every call to get() you must
>>>>> match with a call to release().
>>>>>
>>>>> So, once at the front of your search method you should:
>>>>>
>>>>> MultiSearcher searcher = get();
>>>>>
>>>>> then use that searcher to do searching, retrieve docs, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then in the finally clause, pass that searcher to release.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, only one call to get() and one matching call to release().
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> The searchers are injected into the class via Spring. So when a
>>>>>> client
>>>>>> calls the class it is fully configured with a list of index searchers.
>>>>>> However I have removed this list and instead injecting a list of
>>>>>> directories which are passed to the DocumentSearchManager.
>>>>>> DocumentSearchManager is SearchManager (should've mentioned that
>>>>>> earlier).
>>>>>> So finally I have modified by release code to do the following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> private void release(MultiSearcher multiSeacher) throws Exception {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IndexSearcher[] indexSearchers = (IndexSearcher[])
>>>>>> multiSeacher.getSearchables();
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for(int i =0 ; i < indexSearchers.length;i++) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> documentSearcherManagers[i].release(indexSearchers[i]);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and it's use looks like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> public Summary[] search(final SearchRequest searchRequest)
>>>>>> throwsSearchExecutionException {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> final String searchTerm = searchRequest.getSearchTerm();
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (StringUtils.isBlank(searchTerm)) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> throw new SearchExecutionException("Search string cannot be empty.
>>>>>> There
>>>>>> will be too many results to process.");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> List<Summary> summaryList = new ArrayList<Summary>();
>>>>>>
>>>>>> StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch("searchStopWatch");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> stopWatch.start();
>>>>>>
>>>>>> List<IndexSearcher> indexSearchers = new ArrayList<IndexSearcher>();
>>>>>>
>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Ensuring all index readers are up to date...");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> maybeReopen();
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("All Index Searchers are up to date. No of index
>>>>>> searchers
>>>>>> '"
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> indexSearchers.size() +"'");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Query query = queryParser.parse(searchTerm);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Search Term '" + searchTerm +"' ----> Lucene Query '" +
>>>>>> query.toString() +"'");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sort sort = null;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sort = applySortIfApplicable(searchRequest);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Filter[] filters =applyFiltersIfApplicable(searchRequest);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ChainedFilter chainedFilter = null;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (filters != null) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> chainedFilter = new ChainedFilter(filters, ChainedFilter.OR);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TopDocs topDocs = get().search(query,chainedFilter ,100,sort);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ScoreDoc[] scoreDocs = topDocs.scoreDocs;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("total number of hits for [" + query.toString() + " ] =
>>>>>> "+topDocs.
>>>>>> totalHits);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for (ScoreDoc scoreDoc : scoreDocs) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> final Document doc = get().doc(scoreDoc.doc);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> float score = scoreDoc.score;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> final BaseDocument baseDocument = new BaseDocument(doc, score);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary documentSummary = new DocumentSummaryImpl(baseDocument);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> summaryList.add(documentSummary);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> } catch (Exception e) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> } finally {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> release(get());
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> stopWatch.stop();
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("total time taken for document seach: " +
>>>>>> stopWatch.getTotalTimeMillis() + " ms");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> return summaryList.toArray(new Summary[] {});
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the final post construct constructs the DocumentSearchMangers with
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> list of directories..looking like this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @PostConstruct
>>>>>>
>>>>>> public void initialiseDocumentSearcher() {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper analyzerWrapper = new PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper(
>>>>>> analyzer);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> analyzerWrapper.addAnalyzer(FieldNameEnum.TYPE.getDescription(),
>>>>>> newKeywordAnalyzer());
>>>>>>
>>>>>> queryParser =
>>>>>> newMultiFieldQueryParser(FieldNameEnum.fieldNameDescriptions(),
>>>>>> analyzerWrapper);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Initialising multi searcher ....");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> documentSearcherManagers = new
>>>>>> DocumentSearcherManager[directories.size()];
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for (int i = 0; i < directories.size() ;i++) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Directory directory = directories.get(i);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DocumentSearcherManager documentSearcherManager =
>>>>>> newDocumentSearcherManager(directory);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> documentSearcherManagers[i]=documentSearcherManager;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("multi searcher initialised");
>>>>>>
>>>>>> } catch (IOException e) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amin
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't understand where searchers comes from, prior to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> initializeDocumentSearcher? You should, instead, simply create the
>>>>>>> SearcherManager (from your Directory instances). You don't need any
>>>>>>> searchers during initialize.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is DocumentSearcherManager the same as SearcherManager (just
>>>>>>> renamed)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The release method is wrong -- you're calling .get() and then
>>>>>>> immediately release. Instead, you should step through the searchers
>>>>>>> from your MultiSearcher and release them to each SearcherManager.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You should call your release() in a finally clause.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry...i'm getting slightly confused.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a PostConstruct which is where I should create an array of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> SearchManagers (per indexSeacher). From there I initialise the
>>>>>>>> multisearcher using the get(). After which I need to call
>>>>>>>> maybeReopen
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> each IndexSearcher. So I'll do the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @PostConstruct
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> public void initialiseDocumentSearcher() {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper analyzerWrapper = new
>>>>>>>> PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper(
>>>>>>>> analyzer);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> analyzerWrapper.addAnalyzer(FieldNameEnum.TYPE.getDescription(),
>>>>>>>> newKeywordAnalyzer());
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> queryParser =
>>>>>>>> newMultiFieldQueryParser(FieldNameEnum.fieldNameDescriptions(),
>>>>>>>> analyzerWrapper);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Initialising multi searcher ....");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> documentSearcherManagers = new
>>>>>>>> DocumentSearcherManager[searchers.size()];
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for (int i = 0; i < searchers.size() ;i++) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher indexSearcher = searchers.get(i);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Directory directory = indexSearcher.getIndexReader().directory();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> DocumentSearcherManager documentSearcherManager =
>>>>>>>> newDocumentSearcherManager(directory);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> documentSearcherManagers[i]=documentSearcherManager;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("multi searcher initialised");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> } catch (IOException e) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This initialises search managers. I then have methods:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> private void maybeReopen() throws Exception {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Initiating reopening of index readers...");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for (DocumentSearcherManager documentSearcherManager :
>>>>>>>> documentSearcherManagers) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> documentSearcherManager.maybeReopen();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> private void release() throws Exception {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for (DocumentSearcherManager documentSearcherManager :
>>>>>>>> documentSearcherManagers) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> documentSearcherManager.release(documentSearcherManager.get());
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> private MultiSearcher get() {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> List<IndexSearcher> listOfIndexSeachers = new
>>>>>>>> ArrayList<IndexSearcher>();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for (DocumentSearcherManager documentSearcherManager :
>>>>>>>> documentSearcherManagers) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> listOfIndexSeachers.add(documentSearcherManager.get());
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> multiSearcher = new
>>>>>>>> MultiSearcher(listOfIndexSeachers.toArray(newIndexSearcher[] {}));
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> } catch (IOException e) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> return multiSearcher;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These methods are used in the following manner in the search code:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> public Summary[] search(final SearchRequest searchRequest)
>>>>>>>> throwsSearchExecutionException {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> final String searchTerm = searchRequest.getSearchTerm();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if (StringUtils.isBlank(searchTerm)) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> throw new SearchExecutionException("Search string cannot be empty.
>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>> will be too many results to process.");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> List<Summary> summaryList = new ArrayList<Summary>();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch("searchStopWatch");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> stopWatch.start();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> List<IndexSearcher> indexSearchers = new ArrayList<IndexSearcher>();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Ensuring all index readers are up to date...");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> maybeReopen();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("All Index Searchers are up to date. No of index
>>>>>>>> searchers
>>>>>>>> '"
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> indexSearchers.size() +"'");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Query query = queryParser.parse(searchTerm);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Search Term '" + searchTerm +"' ----> Lucene Query '"
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> query.toString() +"'");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sort sort = null;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sort = applySortIfApplicable(searchRequest);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Filter[] filters =applyFiltersIfApplicable(searchRequest);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ChainedFilter chainedFilter = null;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if (filters != null) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> chainedFilter = new ChainedFilter(filters, ChainedFilter.OR);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> TopDocs topDocs = get().search(query,chainedFilter ,100,sort);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ScoreDoc[] scoreDocs = topDocs.scoreDocs;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("total number of hits for [" + query.toString() + " ] =
>>>>>>>> "+topDocs.
>>>>>>>> totalHits);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for (ScoreDoc scoreDoc : scoreDocs) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> final Document doc = get().doc(scoreDoc.doc);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> float score = scoreDoc.score;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> final BaseDocument baseDocument = new BaseDocument(doc, score);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Summary documentSummary = new DocumentSummaryImpl(baseDocument);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> summaryList.add(documentSummary);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> release();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> } catch (Exception e) {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> stopWatch.stop();
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("total time taken for document seach: " +
>>>>>>>> stopWatch.getTotalTimeMillis() + " ms");
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> return summaryList.toArray(new Summary[] {});
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does this look better? Again..I really really appreciate your help!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is not quite right -- you should only create SearcherManager
>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (per Direcotry) at startup/app load, not with every search request.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And I don't see release -- it must call SearcherManager.release of
>>>>>>>>> each of the IndexSearchers previously returned from get().
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks again for helping on a Sunday!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have now modified my maybeOpen() to do the following:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> private void maybeReopen() throws Exception {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Initiating reopening of index readers...");
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher[] indexSearchers = (IndexSearcher[]) multiSearcher
>>>>>>>>>> .getSearchables();
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher : indexSearchers) {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader indexReader = indexSearcher.getIndexReader();
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SearcherManager documentSearcherManager = new
>>>>>>>>>> SearcherManager(indexReader.directory());
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> documentSearcherManager.maybeReopen();
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And get() to:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> private synchronized MultiSearcher get() {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher[] indexSearchers = (IndexSearcher[]) multiSearcher
>>>>>>>>>> .getSearchables();
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> List<IndexSearcher> indexSearchersList = new
>>>>>>>>>> ArrayList<IndexSearcher>();
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher : indexSearchers) {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader indexReader = indexSearcher.getIndexReader();
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SearcherManager documentSearcherManager = null;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> documentSearcherManager = new
>>>>>>>>>> SearcherManager(indexReader.directory());
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> } catch (IOException e) {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> indexSearchersList.add(documentSearcherManager.get());
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> multiSearcher = new
>>>>>>>>>> MultiSearcher(indexSearchersList.toArray(newIndexSearcher[] {}));
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> } catch (IOException e) {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> return multiSearcher;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This makes all my test pass. I am using the SearchManager that
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>> recommended. Does this look ok?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>>>>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Your maybeReopen has an excess incRef().
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure how you open the searchers in the first place? The
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>>> starts as empty, and nothing populates it?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> When you do the initial population, you need an incRef.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think you're hitting IllegalStateException because maybeReopen
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> closing a reader before get() can get it (since they synchronize
>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> different objects).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'd recommend switching to the SearcherManager class.
>>>>>>>>>>> Instantiate
>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>> for each of your searchers. On each search request, go through
>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>> and call maybeReopen(), and then call get() and gather each
>>>>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher instance into a new array. Then, make a new
>>>>>>>>>>> MultiSearcher (opposite of what I said before): while that
>>>>>>>>>>> creates
>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>> small amount of garbage, it'll keep your code simpler (good
>>>>>>>>>>> tradeoff).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> sorrry I added
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> release(multiSearcher);
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of multiSearcher.close();
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ami...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've now done the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> public Summary[] search(final SearchRequest searchRequest)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> throwsSearchExecutionException {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> final String searchTerm = searchRequest.getSearchTerm();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (StringUtils.isBlank(searchTerm)) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> throw new SearchExecutionException("Search string cannot be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> empty.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will be too many results to process.");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> List<Summary> summaryList = new ArrayList<Summary>();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch("searchStopWatch");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stopWatch.start();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> List<IndexSearcher> indexSearchers = new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ArrayList<IndexSearcher>();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Ensuring all index readers are up to date...");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybeReopen();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("All Index Searchers are up to date. No of index
>>>>>>>>>>>>> searchers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> '"+ indexSearchers.size() +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Query query = queryParser.parse(searchTerm);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Search Term '" + searchTerm +"' ----> Lucene
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Query
>>>>>>>>>>>>> '"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> query.toString() +"'");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sort sort = null;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sort = applySortIfApplicable(searchRequest);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Filter[] filters =applyFiltersIfApplicable(searchRequest);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ChainedFilter chainedFilter = null;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (filters != null) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> chainedFilter = new ChainedFilter(filters, ChainedFilter.OR);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TopDocs topDocs = get().search(query,chainedFilter ,100,sort);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ScoreDoc[] scoreDocs = topDocs.scoreDocs;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("total number of hits for [" + query.toString() +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> =
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "+topDocs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> totalHits);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for (ScoreDoc scoreDoc : scoreDocs) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> final Document doc = multiSearcher.doc(scoreDoc.doc);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> float score = scoreDoc.score;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> final BaseDocument baseDocument = new BaseDocument(doc, score);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Summary documentSummary = new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DocumentSummaryImpl(baseDocument);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> summaryList.add(documentSummary);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiSearcher.close();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> } catch (Exception e) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stopWatch.stop();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("total time taken for document seach: " +
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stopWatch.getTotalTimeMillis() + " ms");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> return summaryList.toArray(new Summary[] {});
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And have the following methods:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @PostConstruct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> public void initialiseQueryParser() {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper analyzerWrapper = new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PerFieldAnalyzerWrapper(
>>>>>>>>>>>>> analyzer);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> analyzerWrapper.addAnalyzer(FieldNameEnum.TYPE.getDescription(),
>>>>>>>>>>>>> newKeywordAnalyzer());
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> queryParser =
>>>>>>>>>>>>> newMultiFieldQueryParser(FieldNameEnum.fieldNameDescriptions(),
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> analyzerWrapper);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("Initialising multi searcher ....");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.multiSearcher = new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MultiSearcher(searchers.toArray(newIndexSearcher[] {}));
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOGGER.debug("multi searcher initialised");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> } catch (IOException e) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initialises mutltisearcher when this class is creared by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> spring.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> private synchronized void swapMultiSearcher(MultiSearcher
>>>>>>>>>>>>> newMultiSearcher) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> try {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release(multiSearcher);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> } catch (IOException e) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> throw new IllegalStateException(e);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiSearcher = newMultiSearcher;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> public void maybeReopen() throws IOException {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MultiSearcher newMultiSeacher = null;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> boolean refreshMultiSeacher = false;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> List<IndexSearcher> indexSearchers = new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ArrayList<IndexSearcher>();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> synchronized (searchers) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher: searchers) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader reader = indexSearcher.getIndexReader();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader.incRef();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Directory directory = reader.directory();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> long currentVersion = reader.getVersion();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (IndexReader.getCurrentVersion(directory) != currentVersion)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader newReader =
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexSearcher.getIndexReader().reopen();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (newReader != reader) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader.decRef();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> refreshMultiSeacher = true;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader = newReader;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher newSearcher = new IndexSearcher(newReader);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexSearchers.add(newSearcher);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (refreshMultiSeacher) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> newMultiSeacher = new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MultiSearcher(indexSearchers.toArray(newIndexSearcher[] {}));
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> warm(newMultiSeacher);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapMultiSearcher(newMultiSeacher);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> private void warm(MultiSearcher newMultiSeacher) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> private synchronized MultiSearcher get() {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher: searchers) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexSearcher.getIndexReader().incRef();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> return multiSearcher;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> private synchronized void release(MultiSearcher multiSearcher)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> throwsIOException {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher: searchers) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexSearcher.getIndexReader().decRef();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> However I am now getting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.IllegalStateException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.store.AlreadyClosedException: this
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> closed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the call:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> private synchronized MultiSearcher get() {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for (IndexSearcher indexSearcher: searchers) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexSearcher.getIndexReader().incRef();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> return multiSearcher;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm doing something wrong ..obviously..not sure where though..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering the same thing ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's best to call this method from a single BG "warming"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> case it would not need its own synchronization.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But, to be safe, I'll add internal synchronization to it. You
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simply put synchronized in front of the method, since you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> block searching.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just a quick point:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> public void maybeReopen() throws IOException {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> //D
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long currentVersion =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currentSearcher.getIndexReader().getVersion();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (IndexReader.getCurrentVersion(dir) != currentVersion) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader newReader =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> currentSearcher.getIndexReader().reopen();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assert newReader != currentSearcher.getIndexReader();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher newSearcher = new IndexSearcher(newReader);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warm(newSearcher);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> swapSearcher(newSearcher);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should the above be synchronised?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ami...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks. i will rewrite..in between giving my baby her feed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> playing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the other child and my wife who wants me to do several
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your input. I would like to have a go at doing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first, Solr may be an option.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * You are creating a new Analyzer & QueryParser every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating unnecessary garbage; instead, they should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & reused.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- I can moved the code out so that it is only created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reused.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * You always make a new IndexSearcher and a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MultiSearcher
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when nothing has changed. This just generates unnecessary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> garbage
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which GC then must sweep up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- This was something I thought about. I could move it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created once. However I presume inside my code i need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> whether
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexreaders are update to date. This needs to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synchronized
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess(?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes you should synchronize the check for whether the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * I don't see any synchronization -- it looks like two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> search
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requests are allowed into this method at the same time?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dangerous... eg both (or, more) will wastefully reopen the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- So i need to extract the logic for reopening and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> provide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> synchronisation mechanism.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok. So I have some work to do. I'll refactor the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> inline to your recommendations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Michael McCandless <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On a quick look, I think there are a few problems with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * I don't see any synchronization -- it looks like two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> search
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requests are allowed into this method at the same time?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dangerous... eg both (or, more) will wastefully reopen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * You are over-incRef'ing (the reader.incRef inside the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> loop)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't see a corresponding decRef.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * You reopen and warm your searchers "live" (vs with BG
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thread);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meaning the unlucky search request that hits a reopen
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pays
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cost. This might be OK if the index is small enough that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reopening & warming takes very little time. But if index
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gets
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> large, making a random search pay that warming cost is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the end user. It erodes their trust in you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * You always make a new IndexSearcher and a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MultiSearcher
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when nothing has changed. This just generates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unnecessary
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> garbage
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which GC then must sweep up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * You are creating a new Analyzer & QueryParser every
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creating unnecessary garbage; instead, they should be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> created
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & reused.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should consider simply using Solr -- it handles all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logic
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you and has been well debugged with time...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amin Mohammed-Coleman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The reason for the indexreader.reopen is because I have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> webapp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enables users to upload files and then search for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documents.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reopen i'm concerned that the facet hit counter won't be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ami...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have been able to get the code working for my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scenario,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> however
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question and I was wondering if I could get some help.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexSearchers which are used in a MultiSearcher class.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexsearchers to get each indexreader and put them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MultiIndexReader.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader[] readers = new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader[searchables.length];
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for (int i =0 ; i < searchables.length;i++) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher indexSearcher =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (IndexSearcher)searchables[i];
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers[i] = indexSearcher.getIndexReader();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexReader newReader = readers[i].reopen();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (newReader != readers[i]) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers[i].close();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> readers[i] = newReader;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> multiReader = new MultiReader(readers);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OpenBitSetFacetHitCounter facetHitCounter =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newOpenBitSetFacetHitCounter();
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher indexSearcher = new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IndexSearcher(multiReader);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I then use the indexseacher to do the facet stuff. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closing the multireader. This is causing problems in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do some other search as the indexreaders are closed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> close
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the multiindexreader or should I do some additional
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method to see if the indexreader is closed?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. Hope that made sense...!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Amin Mohammed-Coleman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ami...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks just what I needed!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 Feb 2009, at 16:11, Marcelo Ochoa <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> marcelo.oc...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Amin:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please take a look a this blog post:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2007/04/lucene-search-within-search-with.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, Marcelo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Amin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mohammed-Coleman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ami...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry to re send this email but I was wondering if I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advice
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 16 Feb 2009, at 20:37, Amin Mohammed-Coleman <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ami...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at building a faceted search using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lucene.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Solr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes with this built in, however I would like to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> myself
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (something to add to my CV!). I have been looking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can use the IndexReader and use TermVectors.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sure how to filter the results so that a particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> user
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subset of results. The next option I was looking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Term term1 = new Term("brand", "ford");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Term term2 = new Term("brand", "vw");
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Term[] termsArray = new Term[] { term1, term2 };un
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> int[] docFreqs =
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> indexSearcher.docFreqs(termsArray);
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only problem here is that I have to provide the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> brand
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new brand is created. Again I'm not sure how I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> results
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may be that I'm using the wrong api methods to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would be grateful if I could get some advice on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> P.S. I am basically trying to do something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> displays
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personal Contact (23) Business Contact (45) and so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marcelo F. Ochoa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://marcelo.ochoa.googlepages.com/home
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ______________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Want to integrate Lucene and Oracle?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/2007/09/running-lucene-inside-your-oracle-jvm.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is Oracle 11g REST ready?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://marceloochoa.blogspot.com/2008/02/is-oracle-11g-rest-ready.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>> java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
