Okay -- that helps.

So we know that searching the same files with Luke works, but with the web app does not. Can you please re-post the fragment of code that opens your index and uses the query?

If you haven't already done this, could you also use query.toString() to confirm the query?

Thanks.

-h


On 27-May-2009, at 12:14 PM, Marco Lazzara wrote:

NO.the app creates the index in a folder  and I run the query  in that
folder.
For example if I decide to create the folder in /home/marco/testIndex
,obviously I run the query on /home/marco/testIndex
if I decide to create the folder in /home/marco/ RDFLUCENE ,obviously I run
the query on /home/marco/RDFLUCENE
But I ALWAYS obtain no results.


In order to understand how tomcat works with lucene I made an experiment: I deleted all files in the index and I tried to run the query in the empty
folder and It fails with:
       no segments* file found in org.apache.lucene.store

It means that Lucene recognizes the index (when it isn't empty) but on the
webapp It obtains no result

Marco Lazzara


2009/5/27 N. Hira <nh...@cognocys.com>

Okay -- if the problem is not the number of results, then let's clarify the
problem:

1.  You create an index in something like:
       /home/marco/testIndex

2.  You copy over the directory to something like:
       /home/marco/RDFIndexLucene

3. When you run Tomcat, your "searcher" tries to open the index at 2. above (using the full path, including the leading slash) and fails with:
       no segments* file found in org.apache.lucene.store


Could you please confirm that this is the problem you are trying to
resolve?  If no, then please correct what I have stated above.

-h


On 27-May-2009, at 11:22 AM, Marco Lazzara wrote:

 In my app I obtain 3 results.But I think is not a problem

Marco Lazzara

2009/5/27 Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>

StandardAnalyzer is fine. I loaded your index into Luke and there is
exactly
one document with philipcimiano in the name field.
There is only one document that has researcher in the name field.
Both of these documents (using StandardAnalyzer) return one
document (doc 12 for PHILIPCIMIANO and doc 4 for RESEARCHER)
as I would expect.

So what is the behavior you expect?

Best
Erick

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Marco Lazzara <marco.lazz...@gmail.com

wrote:


I attache the file testIndex.zip.Run the query with : PHILIPCIMIANO, or
RESEARCHER.

I use StandardAnalyzer.Is it a problem?

Marco Lazzara

2009/5/27 N. Hira <nh...@cognocys.com>

 Not sure if this applies here, but that tends to happen when the

analyzer

you use for indexing is different from the one used in Luke or you're
running into character set issues. Are you using the StandardAnalyzer

in

both cases?

Also, could you post an example of the query you are trying? There are some very smart people who check this list and they may be able to help

you

if they had a "sample" of your index, i.e., create a 10- document index

and

make it available for download so people can look at it for you?

-h

On 27-May-2009, at 2:02 AM, Marco Lazzara wrote:

* I see that you have reported the creation of 3 files, but does Luke


recognize those files as an index and do you see the Documents you

expect

to
see in this index?*
Luke recognizes those files and I see those documents in this index
but

I

observed that when I run the query Luke finds (for example) only 3

files

of
5.
Any ideas???
Marco Lazzara


2009/5/27 N Hira <nh...@cognocys.com>


Sorry for the confusion -- I checked the archive and I could not find

a

message where you have been able to open the index using Luke.

Have you been able to do that? I see that you have reported the
creation
of 3 files, but does Luke recognize those files as an index and do
you
see
the Documents you expect to see in this index?

This is the official site for Luke:
http://www.getopt.org/luke/

-h


----- Original Message ----
From: Marco Lazzara <marco.lazz...@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:59:14 PM
Subject: Re: Searching index problems with tomcat

*Does the part of the web app that is responsible for searching have
permissions to read "/home/marco/testIndex"?*

Yes It does.It can read everywhere.

*Could you add some code to your searching app to print out the
directory
listing to confirm?*

I've already posted them.See May 19

*Also, I may have missed this posting, but could you provide the

answer

from
Step 3. of mhall's suggestion on 22-May, i.e., did you find the data
that
you expected in your index using Luke?*


yes.there are 3 files in the index.see May 24

 -rw-r--r--  1 marco marco 4043 2009-05-24 12:00 _5.cfs
 -rw-r--r--  1 marco marco   58 2009-05-24 12:00 segments_c
 -rw-r--r--  1 marco marco   20 2009-05-24 12:00 segments.gen


2009/5/26 N Hira <nh...@cognocys.com>


 Marco,

Does the part of the web app that is responsible for searching have
permissions to read "/home/marco/testIndex"?

Could you add some code to your searching app to print out the
directory
listing to confirm?

Also, I may have missed this posting, but could you provide the

answer


 from

Step 3. of mhall's suggestion on 22-May, i.e., did you find the data
that
you expected in your index using Luke?

Good luck.

-h



----- Original Message ----
From: Marco Lazzara <marco.lazz...@gmail.com>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 3:45:38 PM
Subject: Re: Searching index problems with tomcat

I tried different things.I tried to create the index without the
web
application,I tried to create the index with a webapp and the index

was

created without any problem.But the research has alway no result.

For example,if the folder i'm searching on is empty, the webapp

cathces


 an

 exception : "no segments* file found in
org.apache.lucene.store.


ramdirect...@home/marco/testIndex...."



It means that Lucene  tries to search in that index but it

fails..maybe


 the

 index is incorrect for a webapp???

MARCO LAZZARA


2009/5/26 Matthew Hall <mh...@informatics.jax.org>

 Right.. so perhaps I'm a bit confused here.


The webapp.. is consuming an index.. yes?

Or, are you trying to create an index via a webapp?

I was assuming that you had some sort of indexing software that you

 were


using to first build your indexes, which the webapp then consumes.


Is that your intent?

Sorry I didn't get back to you before this, but it was a holiday

over


 here.





Marco Lazzara wrote:

Ok i solve the problem I've posted before,I run the web app..It


 creates


  the

index in folder  /home/marco/testIndex with 3 files

-rw-r--r--  1 marco marco 4043 2009-05-24 12:00 _5.cfs
-rw-r--r--  1 marco marco   58 2009-05-24 12:00 segments_c
-rw-r--r--  1 marco marco   20 2009-05-24 12:00 segments.gen

but when I run the query I obtain no results!!!!

Why in my folder there are only 3 files???

Marco Lazzara


2009/5/24 Marco Lazzara <marco.lazz...@gmail.com>



Hi.At step 2 I have only 3 files in the folder,but i think is not

a

problema.I've tried to create the index in the web app e not only

in


 the


standalone application but something failes.Tomcat report this

error

 java.io.FileNotFoundException: no segments* file found in
org.apache.lucene.store.ramdirect...@1c2ec05: files:
 at




org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run (SegmentInfos.java:604)


   at





org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryIndexReader.open (DirectoryIndexReader.java:111)


at org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.open (IndexReader.java:316)

 at

org.apache.lucene.index.IndexReader.open(IndexReader.java: 227)

 at

org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.<init> (IndexSearcher.java:55)

 at org.utils.synonym.WordNetSynonymEngine.<init>(Unknown Source)
at org.indexing.AlternativeRDFIndexing.<init>(Unknown Source)
 at org.gui.CreazioneIndici.run2(Unknown Source)
 at org.gui.Query.main(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
 at




sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)


   at





sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)


   at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)

 at

com.sun.javaws.Launcher.executeApplication(Launcher.java: 1321)

 at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.executeMainClass(Launcher.java:1267)
 at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.doLaunchApp(Launcher.java:1066)
 at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:116)
 at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)

this changes everytime one time it is: no segments* file found in
org.apache.lucene.store.ramdirect...@*1c2ec05*
the second it is no segments* file found in
org.apache.lucene.store.ramdirect...@*170b819*

On the standalone it  works perfectly.

Marco Lazzara

2009/5/22 Matthew Hall <mh...@informatics.jax.org>



 humor me.


Open up your indexing software package.

Step 1: In all places where you reference your index, replace

 whatever


  the

heck you have there with the following EXACT STRING:

/home/marco/testIndex

Do not leave off the leading slash.

After you have made these changes to the indexing software,

 recompile


  and

create your indexes.

Step 2: After your indexing process completes do the following:

cd /home/marco/testIndex/index

You should see files in there, they will look something like

this:


drwxrwxr-x   3 mhall    progs       4.0K May 18 11:19 ..
-rw-rw-r-- 1 mhall progs 80 May 21 16:47 _9j7.fnm -rw-rw-r-- 1 mhall progs 4.1G May 21 16:50 _9j7.fdt -rw-rw-r-- 1 mhall progs 434M May 21 16:50 _9j7.fdx -rw-rw-r-- 1 mhall progs 280M May 21 16:52 _9j7.frq -rw-rw-r-- 1 mhall progs 108M May 21 16:52 _9j7.prx -rw-rw-r-- 1 mhall progs 329M May 21 16:52 _9j7.tis -rw-rw-r-- 1 mhall progs 4.7M May 21 16:52 _9j7.tii -rw-rw-r-- 1 mhall progs 108M May 21 16:52 _9j7.nrm
-rw-rw-r--   1 mhall    progs         47 May 21 16:52

segments_9je

-rw-rw-r--   1 mhall    progs         20 May 21 16:52

segments.gen


You have now confirmed that you are actually creating indexes.

 And


 the


indexes you are creating exist at EXACTLY the place you have asked


 them


  to.


Step 3: Then.. go download luke, and open these indexes.
 Perform

a

query
on them, confirm that the data you want is actually IN the

indexes.


Step 4: Now, open up your standalone application, and replace

 whatever


  you

are using in the to open the index with the SAME string I have

 listed


  above.


Perform a search, verify that the indexes are there, and
actually

 return


  values.


Step 5: Lastly, go into your web application and again replace

the


 path


  with the one I have above, recompile, and perform a search.
 Verify


 that


  the

indexes are actually THERE and searchable.

This.. damn well SHOULD work, if it doesn't it is likely
pointing
to
some
other issues in what you have setup. For example your tomcat

 instance


  could

perhaps not have permission to read the lucene indexes directory.

  You


should be able to tell this in the tomcat logs, BUT don't do this


 yet.


Carefully and fully follow the steps I have outlined for you, and


 then


  you

have chased down the full debugging path for this.

If this yields nothing for you, I'd be happy to take a closer

look


 at


  your

source code, but until then give this a shot.

Oh.. if it fails, please post back EXACTLY which steps in the

above

outlined process failed for you, as that will be really really

 helpful.




Matt



Marco Lazzara wrote:



 I dont't know hot to solve the problem..I've tried all
rationals

things.Maybe the last thing is to try to index not with
FSDirectory

 but


  with

something else.I have to peruse the api documentation.
But.....IF IT WAS A LUCENE'S BUG???

2009/5/22 Matthew Hall <mh...@informatics.jax.org>





 because that's the default index write behavior.


It will create any directory that you ask it to.

Matt


Marco Lazzara wrote:





ok.I understand what you really mean but It doesn't work.

I understand one thing.For example When i try to open an
index
in

 the


following location : "RDFIndexLucene/" but the folder doesn't

exist,*Lucene
create an empty folder named "RDFIndexLucene"* in my home
folder...WHY???

MARCO LAZZARA

2009/5/22 Matthew Hall <mh...@informatics.jax.org>







 For writing indexes?


Well I guess it depends on what you want.. but I personally

use

this:

(2.3.2 API)

File INDEX_DIR = "/data/searchtool/ thisismyindexdirectory" Analyzer analyzer = new WhateverConcreteAnalyzerYouWant();

writer = new IndexWriter(/INDEX_DIR/, /analyzer/, true);

Your best bet would be to peruse the API docs of whatever
lucene
version
you are using.

However, I'm still pretty sure this ISN'T your actual issue

 here.



 Looking at your "full path" example those still seem to be by
reference
to
me. Let me be more specific and tell you EXACTLY what I mean

by

that,

Lets say you are running your program in the following

 directory:



 /home/test/app/

Trying to open an index like you have below will effectively

be

trying
to
open an index in the following location:

/home/test/app/home/marco/RdfIndexLucene

What I think you MEAN to be doing is:

/home/marco/RdfIndexLucene

That leading slash is VERY VERY important, as its the entire
difference
between an relative path and an absolute one.

Matt


Marco Lazzara wrote:







 I was talking with my teacher.

Is it correct to use FSDirectory?Could you please look
again
at

 the


  code

I've posted here??
Should I choose a different way to Indexing ??

Marco Lazzara




2009/5/22 Ian Lea <ian....@gmail.com>









OK. I'd still like to see some evidence, but never mind.


Next suggestion is the old standby - cut the code down to

the

absolute
minimum to demonstrate the problem and post it here. I

know

you've
already posted some code, but maybe not all of it, and

 definitely


  not

cut down to the absolute minimum.


--
Ian.


On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Marco Lazzara <
marco.lazz...@gmail.com
   wrote:








_I strongly suggest that you use a full path name and/or


 provide


   some

evidence that your readers and writers are using the same
directory
and thus lucene index.
_
I try a full path like home/marco/ RdfIndexLucene,even media/disk/users/fratelli/RDFIndexLucene.But nothing is

 changed.



 MARCOLAZZARA
_

_








Its been a few days, and we haven't heard back about
this


 issue,


   can

we assume that you fixed it via using fully qualified

paths

then?

Matt

Ian Lea wrote:








 Marco



You haven't answered Matt's question about where you
are
running
it
from. Tomcat's default directory may well not be the

same


 as


   yours.

I strongly suggest that you use a full path name and/or

 provide


   some

evidence that your readers and writers are using the

same

directory
and thus lucene index.


--
Ian.


On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Marco Lazzara
<marco.lazz...@gmail.com> wrote:









I've posted the indexing part,but I don't use this in

my

app.After
I
create the index,I put that in a folder like








 /home/marco/RDFIndexLucece







and when I run the query I'm only searching (and not


 indexing).








String[] fieldsearch = new String[] {"name", "synonyms",

"propIn"};




 //RDFinder rdfind = new

RDFinder("RDFIndexLucene/",fieldsearch);


 TreeMap<Integer, ArrayList<String>> paths;

try {
         this.paths = this.rdfind.Search(text,

"path");

     } catch (ParseException e1) {
         e1.printStackTrace();
     } catch (IOException e1) {
         e1.printStackTrace();
     }

Marco Lazzara









Sorry, anyhow looking over this quickly here's a

summarization
of








 what







 I see:







You have documents in your index that look like the


 following:






 name which is indexed and stored.



 synonyms which are indexed and stored


 path, which is stored but not indexed
propin, which is stored and indexed
propinnum, which is stored but not indexed
and ... vicinity I guess which is stored but not

indexed


For an analyzer you are using Standard analyzer
(which
considering








 all







 the Italian? is an interesting choice.)







And you are opening your index using FSDirectory, in
what

appears
to




 be a by reference fashion (You don't have a fully


 qualified


   path



 to


where your index is, you are ASSUMING that its in the

 same


    directory

as this code, unless FSDirectory is not implemented as

I

think
it








 is.)







Now can I see the consumer code? Specifically the

part

...

[Messaggio troncato]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hira, N.R.
Cognocys, Inc.
(773) 251-7453

Catch up on the news.  http://www.cognocys.com/prospector/news.html






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to