+1 to just have NoMergePolicy.INSTANCE Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think NoMergePolicy.NO_COMPOUND_FILES and > NoMergePolicy.COMPOUND_FILES should be removed, and replaced with > NoMergePolicy.INSTANCE > > If you want to change whether CFS is used by indexwriter flush, you > need to set that in IndexWriterConfig. > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Varun Thacker > <varunthacker1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I wanted to use the NoMergePolicy.NO_COMPOUND_FILES to ensure that no >> merges take place on the index. However I was unsuccessful at it. What I am >> doing wrong here. >> >> Attaching a gist with - >> 1. Output when using NoMergePolicy.NO_COMPOUND_FILES >> 2. Output when using TieredMergePolicy with policy.setNoCFSRatio(0.0) >> 3. The code snippet I used. >> >> https://gist.github.com/vthacker/11398124 >> >> I tried it using Lucene 4.7 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Regards, >> Varun Thacker >> http://www.vthacker.in/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org
