Hmmm, you might want to move this over to the Solr user's list. This list is lucene, which doesn't have anything to do with post.jar ;)...
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > Try a cURL statement like: > > curl " > http://localhost:8983/solr/update/extract?literal.id=doc33&captureAttr=true&defaultField=text"; > -F "myfile=@testRTFVarious.rtf > > > first, then work up to the post.jar bits... > > > Two cautions: > > 1> make sure to commit afterwards. Something like > > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/update?commit=true > > will work > > 2> uncomment the line: > > <dynamicField name="*" type="string" multiValued="true" /> > > > in your schema.xml (and restart solr). > > > Also, track your output to see if it went through successfully. > > > Best, > Erick > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Shruthi <sse...@imedx.com> wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> Finally I have been able to convince my team to go for indexing all >> documents first and then search rather than do on the fly indexing. I have >> set up Solr on my machine but unable to index RTF'f. I have followed the >> tutorial..but no where RTF is mentioned..Can someone please help me.. >> I tried following options: >> Java -Dtype=application/RTF -jar post.jar *.RTF >> Java -Dtype=application/rtf -jar post.jar *.RTF >> Java -Dtype=text/RTF -jar post.jar *.RTF >> >> Thanks, >> Shruthi Sethi >> SR. SOFTWARE ENGINEER >> iMedX >> OFFICE: >> 033-4001-5789 ext. N/A >> MOBILE: >> 91-9903957546 >> EMAIL: >> sse...@imedx.com >> WEB: >> www.imedx.com >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ralf Heyde [mailto:xoodrena...@gmx.de] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:56 AM >> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: AW: NewBie To Lucene || Perfect configuration on a 64 bit server >> >> Hey, >> >> I have several notes about your process. >> >> 1st: How you select the documents you are passing to the index for further >> searching? Maybe it is more straight forward to "find" them on you >> programming language? >> 2nd: Storage is cheap, buy a hard-disk and store the overall index. The >> most >> expensive operation is the indexing and the first read access (caching on >> Lucene / OS level). Imagine what happens when you build the index and >> delete >> it afterwards just for a "simple" search operation on a subset of your >> documents. >> >> Cheers, Ralf >> >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: rulinma [mailto:ruli...@gmail.com] >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Mai 2014 03:14 >> An: java-user@lucene.apache.org >> Betreff: RE: NewBie To Lucene || Perfect configuration on a 64 bit server >> >> 1000+ is solr, lucenen more fast. >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NewBie-To-Lucene-Perfect-configuration-on >> -a-64-bit-server-tp4136871p4138215.html >> <http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NewBie-To-Lucene-Perfect-configuration-on-a-64-bit-server-tp4136871p4138215.html> >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >
