I would be surprised if any J2ME phones were ones people were attached
to - its more like grudging acceptance. Even blackberry kind of did
their own thing.

I think the most common response is Joe's flinging his razor into
orbit ;)

On Jul 2, 1:14 am, Joshua Marinacci <jos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is incorrect. There are over a billion installations of Java on  
> cellphones. Google has made J2ME based clients before Android and  
> continues to do so. If you want to hit more than 5% of the market you  
> have to use Java.
>
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 5:24 AM, Casper Bang wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'm surprised I haven't heard Dick complain about Google Earth, Picasa
> > etc. not being written to run on the JVM. It's particular interesting
> > that for these popular applications, Google actually prefers to pour
> > money into Wine rather than implement in Java. And on the mobile, Java
> > was never as popular (forget Gosling/Schwartz gazillion evangelism) as
> > now with Android.
>
> > In other words, something must be wrong with the JVM as soon as we are
> > out of a server context. In that perspective, why should users and
> > developers care about not having a genuine JVM in the middle of their
> > Oreo?
>
> > /Casper
>
> > On 1 Jul., 05:19, Michael Neale <michael.ne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> In ep 262 (the one where Dick's BS detector when crazy) - I got the
> >> impression that Dick was asserting that Google are being evil (for a
> >> few reasons, such as ignoring the community, not giving enough back
> >> etc) - Joe called it business.
>
> >> I have no affiliation with Google, and its kind of wierd that I feel
> >> obliged to defend something that doesn't need my help (!) - but I
> >> thought it was a bit unfair.
>
> >> On the contribution side, Google are one of the largest contributors
> >> to open source (some have said they are not the largest by some
> >> measures) - now that a lot of open source free for all at Sun may  
> >> stop
> >> under Oracle (at least where it makes commercial sense to stop),
> >> Google is even more important for open source as a whole (not just
> >> Java open source) so they should be encouraged. They contribute to
> >> lots of projects, they originate some excellent ones, they
> >> increasingly want to open things (like wave) where it makes sense.  
> >> And
> >> on top of that, they provide lots of support and hosting of events
> >> (and they ALWAYS cater wonderfully) - if there is a Google office in
> >> your sydney - they probably would love to help out your community.
> >> They also provide gainful employment to Sun refugees to allow them to
> >> continue their great work ;)
>
> >> On the community side: yes I pick up there is a bit of aloofness- but
> >> there is no ill intent, its just that there are individuals in the
> >> communities that happen to be employed by google. Also, and there is
> >> no nice way to say this, but in a popular language/platform as java,
> >> the community does tend to be more "average" - this can "cramp their
> >> style" so to speak - eg Andoid is what JME could/should have been,  
> >> and
> >> so on... Design by committee isn't great for innovation in general.
>
> >> What I can assume was the real beef, is the slipping away from the  
> >> one
> >> true vision of the "write once run anywhere" vision of Java, and  
> >> using
> >> the JVM everywhere to achieve that. And I guess that is a problem, I
> >> don't know if its a good or bad thing. It is what it is. In the java
> >> community, I think there has been a lot of mediocrity tolerated in
> >> order to get the lowest common denominator for portability. And
> >> despite what people say, portability is excellent now, and has been
> >> for a long long time. I think the tech community doesn't remember the
> >> bad old days of platforms that had nothing in common and it wasn't
> >> easy to migrate. But some people are tired of this mediocrity, and
> >> just want to get cool things done - and I guess compromises are being
> >> made.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to