> Well, C# has many great features. However, it is a pitty that C# has > not checked exceptions.
To restate Fabrizio Giudici from earlier, it's funny how one mans feature is another mans bug. While they can occasionally be useful, the debate is over. Checked exceptions offers more drawbacks than benefits, especially in how they pollute the signature and leak abstractions. No other language introduced them before or after Java for the same reason. > Java platform is usable on lots of mobile phones, personal computers > and servers. You can use C# on: > * possibly some mobile phones, but not as many as with Java > * personal computers with .NET Framework (Windows only) or Mono (It > does not implement many features correctly.) > * servers... like PCs True to a certain degree. Mind you, while there's a Mono stack for the popular iPhone, you will never be able to see Java there due to Apple handcuffs and lack of versatility of the JVM: http://www.mono-project.com/MonoTouch /Casper --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to javaposse+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
